Healing effect of warfarin in the course of cerulein-induced acute pancreatitis in rats.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is the most common gastrointestinal disease leading to hospitalizations and unexpected deaths. The development of AP leads to damage of the pancreatic microcirculation with a cascade of subsequent events resulting, among others, in coagulopathy. Previous research showed that anticoagulants can be important therapeutic agents. Heparin and acenocoumarol can alleviate the course of AP, as well as accelerate healing and post-inflammatory regeneration of the pancreas. The aim of this study was to determine whether warfarin, a drug with more stable effects than acenocoumarol, affects the healing and regeneration of the pancreas in the cerulein-induced AP. AP was evoked in Wistar male rats by intraperitoneal administration of cerulein. The first dose of warfarin (45, 90 or 180 µg/kg) was administered 24 hours after the first dose of cerulein and the doses of warfarin were repeated once a day in subsequent 10 days. The severity of AP was assessed immediately after the last dose of cerulein, as well as at days 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 after AP induction. Treatment with warfarin dose-dependently increased international normalized ratio (INR) and attenuated the severity of pancreatitis in histological examination and accelerated pancreatic recovery. These effects were accompanied with a faster reduction in the AP-evoked increase in serum activity of amylase and lipase, the serum concentration of pro-inflammatory interleukin-1ß, and the plasma level of D-Dimer. In addition, treatment with warfarin decreased pancreatic weight (an index of pancreatic edema) and improved pancreatic blood flow in rats with AP. The therapeutic effect was particularly pronounced after the administration of warfarin at a dose of 90 µg/kg. We conclude that treatment with warfarin accelerated regeneration of the pancreas and recovery in the course of cerulein-induced mild-edematous acute pancreatitis.

Healthcare resources and costs associated with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in Spain: apixaban versus acenocoumarol.

Aim: Healthcare resources usage and costs associated to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were analyzed in Spain. Methods: This is an observational and retrospective study on patients with NVAF who started their treatment with apixaban or acenocoumarol between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017. Results: 2160 patients treated with apixaban were paired (1:1) with patients treated with acenocoumarol (propensity score matching). Apixaban reduced the incidence of strokes and systemic embolisms, minor and major bleedings and deaths, versus acenocoumarol. Apixaban led to reductions of 80, 55 and 43% in costs related to nursing visits, hospitalizations, and emergency visits, respectively, leading to annual cost savings of €274/patient, from the perspective of society. Conclusion: Our results suggested that apixaban is a cost-effective alternative for patients with NVAF.

Duration of Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients with Genetic Inherited Thrombophilia.

Background: Genetic factors play an important role in deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The duration of anticoagulation therapy in patients with verified genetic inheritance and previous events of DVT is still questionable. Case reports: We present three cases of siblings (two brothers and one sister) with verified Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and genetic inheritance. The first case is a 33 y.o. male who was admitted with bilateral massive pulmonary thromboembolism and DVT of the right femoral vein. He had an episode of DVT 4 years ago. Fibrinolytic therapy was introduced immediately. Afterwards, unfractionated heparin was introduced, and then switched to enoxaparin and acenocoumarol. Because of inappropriate INR, it was switched then to rivaroxaban. The imaging methods showed significant improvement, and the patient was discharged from the hospital with rivaroxaban at 2x15 mg/day for another 2 weeks and was instructed to continue 20 mg/day until his next control. In the meantime, the second case, a 36 y.o. male, brother to the first patient, came with vein thrombosis of vena saphena magna of the left leg. Treatment with Acenocoumarol was started and continued for 2 years until complete resolution of the thrombi, and then it was changed to Aspirin. The third case is the sister of the first 2 cases, a 38 y.o female with symptoms and findings almost similar to those in the second case. She was treated with Acenocoumarol for 6 months. Doppler ultrasound showed complete resolution of the thrombosis and anticoagulation therapy was stopped. Genetic investigations for mutation showed presence of homozygous gene mutation for Prothrombin (PTB G20210A) in the first patient, his brother (the second case) was compound heterozygote for PTB and for MTHFR C677T, and his sister (third case) was heterozygous only for the PTB mutation. According to the clinical (recurrent unprovoked DVT with thromboembolic complications) and genetic testing (homozygous gene mutation for PTB) in the first patient, we decided to continue the secondary thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban 10 mg/day indefinitely. Conclusion: Testing for genetically inherited thrombophilia should be included in the risk assessment for recurrence, and performed in all patients under 50 y.o. who have a first, non-provoked episode of thrombosis, in order to determine the duration of anticoagulation therapy.

Warfarin resistance: possibilities to solve this problem. A case report.

Effective prevention of thromboembolism is essential for patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves. For this group of patients, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remain the drug group of choice despite the widespread use of new anticoagulants in other diseases. As a consequence, warfarin resistance remains a serious challenge for physicians. The current report describes a 65-year-old male patient that had a mechanical prosthetic aortic valve implanted due to severe aortic insufficiency after infective endocarditis. Despite consistent increases in his warfarin dose, the level of international normalized ratio (INR) remained very low. The patient was considered to have warfarin resistance. Warfarin was successfully replaced by another VKA, acenocoumarol, which resulted in a stable INR observed over 1 year of follow-up. Achieving the target INR in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves using VKAs is the main goal of thromboprophylaxis. Although the genetic changes that cause warfarin resistance are understood, the options to overcome these pharmacogenetic issues remain limited. Based on the success with this current patient, physicians with similar patients with warfarin resistance might wish to consider replacing warfarin with acenocoumarol.

Acenocumarol: uso, adherencia y conocimiento del usuario. Oportunidades para la Atención Farmacéutica / Acenocumarol: use, adherence and knowledge. Opportunities for Pharmaceutical Care

Objetivo: El acenocumarol se mantiene como terapia anticoagulante (TAO) de primera elección. El objetivo de este estudio es valorar y mejorar el conocimiento que sobre el medicamento tienen sus usuarios y favorecer la personalización de la Atención Farmacéutica. Método: 60 pacientes usuarios de acenocumarol de 6 farmacias de Tenerife han participado en una encuesta anónima para valorar el uso, la adherencia y el conocimiento del fármaco. Resultados: 16% de los usuarios desconoce la indicación para la que se les prescribe el anticoagulante, un 32% son pacientes sin adherencia terapéutica y existe un alto grado de desconocimiento (47%) sobre cómo actuar en caso de olvido de una toma. La duplicidad de dosis es un PRM (Problema Relacionado con el Medicamento) real para el 12% de los pacientes. El 87% usa otros tratamientos junto con el acenocumarol (antihipertensivos (24%), antihipercolesterolémicos (11%), ansiolíticos/sedantes (13%) y antiulcerosos (13%)) destacando el uso conjunto de acenocumarol y analgésicos/antiinflamatorios en el 11% de nuestros usuarios de acenocumarol lo que se identifica como un riesgo potencial grave de PRM por interacción. El 35% de los pacientes desconoce las interacciones del acenocumarol, un 70% afirma haber recibido información sobre el fármaco y sólo un 42% de los pacientes manifiesta no haber leído el prospecto. Conclusiones: Se pone de manifiesto la necesidad de mejorar el conocimiento sobre este fármaco por parte del paciente. La intervención farmacéutica mediante la dispensación activa e informada y el seguimiento fármaco terapéutico personalizado permitiría la detección y prevención de PRM durante el uso de acenocumarol.(AU)

Aims: Acenocoumarol remains the first-line anticoagulant therapy (OAT). The objective of this study is to assess and improve the knowledge that users have about this drug and advance in the personalization of pharmaceutical care. Method: 60 acenocoumarol patients from 6 Tenerife pharmacies have participated in an anonymous survey to assess the use, adherence and knowledge of the drug. Results: 16% of acenocoumarol users do not know the indication for which the anticoagulant is prescribed, 32% are patients without therapeutic adherence and there is a high degree of ignorance (47%) about how to act in case of forgetting a dose. Duplication of doses is a real DRP (Drug Related Problem) for 12% of patients. 87% of those surveyed use other treatments together with acenocoumarol (antihypertensive (24%), antihypercholesterolemic (11%), anxiolytic / sedative (13%) and antiulcer (13%)), highlighting the joint use of acenocoumarol and analgesic/anti-inflammatory in 11% of our acenocoumarol users this is identified as a potential serious risk of DRP by interaction. 35% of the patients admit that they are unaware of the possible interactions of acenocoumarol, 70% of the patients affirm that they have received information about the drug, and only 42% of the patients state that they have not read the package leaflet. Conclusions: The need to improve knowledge about this drug by the patient is highlighted. Pharmaceutical intervention through active and informed dispensing and personalized therapeutic drug monitoring would allow the detection and prevention of DRP during the use of acenocoumarol.(AU)

[Switching from acenocoumarol to phenprocoumon: step in personalised anticoagulation?] / Overstappen van acenocoumarol naar fenprocoumon.

Acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon are vitamin K antagonists (VKA) with average half-lives of 11 hours and 160 hours, respectively. They are used to treat and prevent thrombosis in mechanical cardiac valve replacement, atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. There are historical regional differences in preferred VKA in the Netherlands. Safe and effective treatment requires the international normalized ratios (INRs) to be in the therapeutic range, and stable. Theoretically, the longer-acting phenprocoumon would yield a higher time in therapeutic range (TTR) and lower INR variability. In practice, switching from acenocoumarol to phenprocoumon eventually improves INR variability and in some patients TTR as well. However, during the preceding transition period, INRs are more often volatile and supratherapeutic. Furthermore, switching to an alternative VKA could weaken integrated care, as other healthcare providers are less experienced with it. Healthcare providers must coordinate an intended switch with the anticoagulation clinic.

Anticoagulation Control with Acenocoumarol or Warfarin in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation in Primary Care (Fantas-TIC Study).

Introduction: The use of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is complicated due to the narrow therapeutic margin they present and their unpredictable dose-response relationship. Most studies are based on warfarin, with the results being extrapolated to acenocoumarol. However, studies comparing the two treatments in terms of the degree of anticoagulation control are scarce, justifying the present study. Main factors associated with poor control of time in therapeutic range (TTR) of anticoagulated patients are also studied. Methods: Cross-sectional study, with real-world data from patients treated in primary care (PC). Data were obtained from the System for the Improvement of Research in PC (SIDIAP) database, covering 60,978 NVAF-anticoagulated patients from 287 PC centres in 2018. Descriptive statistics were derived, and odds ratios were estimated by multivariate logistic regression. Results: 41,430 patients were considered: 93% were being treated with acenocoumarol and 7% with warfarin. There was no difference in poor control of TTR between the two types of VKA treatment, acenocoumarol and warfarin (38.9 vs. 38.4; p = 0.610). Poor anticoagulation control was mainly associated with advanced alcoholism (OR = 1.38), liver failure (OR = 1.37) and intracranial haemorrhage (OR = 1.35) as well as female sex, age < 60 years, cardiovascular history, diabetes mellitus and other variables. Conclusions: There is no association between poor anticoagulation control and the type of VKA treatment administered. Factors associated with poor control of TTR must be considered in clinical practice to improve control and decision-making.

Comparison of Anticoagulation Quality between Acenocoumarol and Warfarin in Patients with Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valves: Insights from the Nationwide PLECTRUM Study.

Vitamin K antagonists are indicated for the thromboprophylaxis in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves (MPHV). However, it is unclear whether some differences between acenocoumarol and warfarin in terms of anticoagulation quality do exist. We included 2111 MPHV patients included in the nationwide PLECTRUM registry. We evaluated anticoagulation quality by the time in therapeutic range (TiTR). Factors associated with acenocoumarol use and with low TiTR were investigated by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Mean age was 56.8 ± 12.3 years; 44.6% of patients were women and 395 patients were on acenocoumarol. A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that patients on acenocoumarol had more comorbidities (i.e., ≥3, odds ratio (OR) 1.443, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.081-1.927, p = 0.013). The mean TiTR was lower in the acenocoumarol than in the warfarin group (56.1 ± 19.2% vs. 61.6 ± 19.4%, p < 0.001). A higher prevalence of TiTR (<60%, <65%, or <70%) was found in acenocoumarol users than in warfarin ones (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Acenocoumarol use was associated with low TiTR regardless of the cutoff used at multivariable analysis. A lower TiTR on acenocoumarol was found in all subgroups of patients analyzed according to sex, hypertension, diabetes, age, valve site, atrial fibrillation, and INR range. In conclusion, anticoagulation quality was consistently lower in MPHV patients on acenocoumarol compared to those on warfarin.

Aspirin versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection (TREAT-CAD): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Cervical artery dissection is a major cause of stroke in young people (aged <50 years). Historically, clinicians have preferred using oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists for patients with cervical artery dissection, although some current guidelines-based on available evidence from mostly observational studies-suggest using aspirin. If proven to be non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists, aspirin might be preferable, due to its ease of use and lower cost. We aimed to test the non-inferiority of aspirin to vitamin K antagonists in patients with cervical artery dissection. METHODS: We did a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial in ten stroke centres across Switzerland, Germany, and Denmark. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients aged older than 18 years who had symptomatic, MRI-verified, cervical artery dissection within 2 weeks before enrolment, to receive either aspirin 300 mg once daily or a vitamin K antagonist (phenprocoumon, acenocoumarol, or warfarin; target international normalised ratio [INR] 2·0-3·0) for 90 days. Randomisation was computer-generated using an interactive web response system, with stratification according to participating site. Independent imaging core laboratory adjudicators were masked to treatment allocation, but investigators, patients, and clinical event adjudicators were aware of treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was a composite of clinical outcomes (stroke, major haemorrhage, or death) and MRI outcomes (new ischaemic or haemorrhagic brain lesions) in the per-protocol population, assessed at 14 days (clinical and MRI outcomes) and 90 days (clinical outcomes only) after commencing treatment. Non-inferiority of aspirin would be shown if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI of the absolute risk difference between groups was less than 12% (non-inferiority margin). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02046460. FINDINGS: Between Sept 11, 2013, and Dec 21, 2018, we enrolled 194 patients; 100 (52%) were assigned to the aspirin group and 94 (48%) were assigned to the vitamin K antagonist group. The per-protocol population included 173 patients; 91 (53%) in the aspirin group and 82 (47%) in the vitamin K antagonist group. The primary endpoint occurred in 21 (23%) of 91 patients in the aspirin group and in 12 (15%) of 82 patients in the vitamin K antagonist group (absolute difference 8% [95% CI -4 to 21], non-inferiority p=0·55). Thus, non-inferiority of aspirin was not shown. Seven patients (8%) in the aspirin group and none in the vitamin K antagonist group had ischaemic strokes. One patient (1%) in the vitamin K antagonist group and none in the aspirin group had major extracranial haemorrhage. There were no deaths. Subclinical MRI outcomes were recorded in 14 patients (15%) in the aspirin group and in 11 patients (13%) in the vitamin K antagonist group. There were 19 adverse events in the aspirin group, and 26 in the vitamin K antagonist group. INTERPRETATION: Our findings did not show that aspirin was non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of cervical artery dissection. FUNDING: Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Heart Foundation, Stroke Funds Basel, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Academic Society Basel.

Outcomes of long-term anticoagulant treatment for the secondary prophylaxis of splanchnic venous thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening disease usually related to different underlying clinical conditions. The risk of SVT recurrences is high over time in patients with an underlying permanent prothrombotic condition. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) represent the mainstay of treatment for SVT. Data about the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are reported in the literature for the treatment of acute SVT, but less is known about their application for the secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of long-term DOACs therapy in patients at high-risk of thrombosis, compared to VKA. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre study including 70 patients with SVT on long-term anticoagulant treatment with VKA followed-up at our Units between January 2017 and December 2019. All the patients were at high thrombotic risk defined as the presence of a permanent prothrombotic condition requiring long-term anticoagulation. During follow-up, 28 patients were shifted to DOACs and their clinical outcomes were compared to those of the patients who continued VKA therapy. All the arterial and venous thrombotic events of the splanchnic and extra-splanchnic districts as well as the haemorrhagic adverse events occurring during follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: Of the seventy patients enrolled in the study, 36 patients (51.4%) had a single-segment involvement thrombosis (28.5% of portal vein, 7.1% of superior mesenteric vein, 4.3% of splenic vein, 11.5% of hepatic veins) and 34 patients (48.6%) had multi-segment involvement at the time of diagnosis. 42 patients (60%) continued VKA therapy and 28 (40%) were switched to DOACs. Median follow-up was 6 years (range 2-8) during VKA and 1.9 years (range 1-5.2) during DOACs. The incidence of thrombotic events was similar between patients on VKA and those on DOACs. Patients on VKA developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and of the patients on DOACs 1 developed NSTEMI and 1 DVT. No major haemorrhagic events occurred. Minor bleedings occurred in 26% of patients on VKA and in none of the DOACs patients (P: 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight that DOACs could represent an effective and safe alternative to the VKA for secondary prophylaxis in SVT patients at high risk of thrombosis.

Cost-effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonist in atrial fibrillation: A study protocol using Real-World Data from Catalonia (FantasTIC Study).

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant therapy is used for stroke prevention and proved to be effective and safe in the long term. The study aims to analyse the cost-effectiveness relationship of using of direct-acting oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists to prevent ischaemic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, including all the active ingredients marketed in Spain, prescribed for 2 years in the Primary Care service of the Institut Català de la Salut. METHODS: Population-based cohort study, in which the cost of the 2 treatment groups will be evaluated. Direct costs (pharmacy, primary care, emergency and hospitalization) and indirect costs (lost productivity) will be included from a social perspective. Effectiveness (assessed as the occurrence of a health event, the 1 of primary interest being stroke) will be determined, with a 2-year time horizon and a 3% discount rate. The average cost of the 2 groups of drugs will be compared using a regression model to determine the factors with the greatest influence on determining costs. We will carry out a univariate ('one-way') deterministic sensitivity analysis. DISCUSSION: We hope to provide relevant information about direct and indirect costs of oral anticoagulants, which, together with aspects of effectiveness and safety, could help shape the consensual decision-making of evaluating bodies.

[Learning with COVID-19: what about anticoagulation?]

Infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic disease. So-me authors recommend anticoagulation at therapeutic doses for, at least, the most severely ill patients; this practice is not free of risks, which is why only thromboembolic prophylaxis is recommended by other consensuses. In the case of previously anticoagulated patients, changing the oral anticoagulant for a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is generally recommended. We present the cases of two patients admitted due to COVID-19, without serious clinical data, in whom anticoagulation (acenocoumarol and rivaroxaban, respectively) was replaced by LMWH at therapeutic doses, both presenting abdominal bleeding. This type of bleeding is an infrequent complication in anticoagulated patients, but the concurrence of two cases in a short period of time in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic leads us to consider that there is not yet any clear evidence on therapeutic anticoagulation in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Aprendiendo con el COVID-19: ¿qué pasa con la anticoagulación? / Learning with COVID-19: what about anticoagulation?

La infección por SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) se relaciona con un aumento del riesgo de enfermedad tromboembólica. Algunos autores recomiendan la anticoagulación en dosis terapéuticas de, al menos, los pacientes más graves, práctica no exenta de riesgos, por lo que otros consensos solo recomiendan la profilaxis tromboembólica. La recomendación generalizada en pacientes previamente anticoagulados es el cambio del anticoagulante oral por heparina de bajo peso molecular (HBPM). Presentamos dos pacientes ingresados por COVID-19 sin datos de gravedad, en los que se sustituyó la anticoagulación (acenocumarol en un caso y rivaroxabán en el otro) por HBPM a dosis terapéuticas, presentando ambos sangrados abdominales. Estos sangrados son una complicación infrecuente en pacientes anticoagulados, pero la concurrencia de dos casos en un breve espacio de tiempo en el contexto de la pandemia por COVID-19 nos plantea que aún no se dispone de una evidencia clara sobre la anticoagulación terapéutica en la infección por SARS-CoV-2

Infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic disease. Some authors recommend anticoagulation at therapeutic doses for, at least, the most severely ill patients; this practice is not free of risks, which is why only thromboembolic prophylaxis is recommended by other consensuses. In the case of previously anticoagulated patients, changing the oral anticoagulant for a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is generally recommended. We present the cases of two patients admitted due to COVID-19, without serious clinical data, in whom anticoagulation (acenocoumarol and rivaroxaban, respectively) was replaced by LMWH at therapeutic doses, both presenting abdominal bleeding. This type of bleeding is an infrequent complication in anticoagulated patients, but the concurrence of two cases in a short period of time in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic leads us to consider that there is not yet any clear evidence on therapeutic anticoagulation in SARS-CoV-2 infection

Effect of switching from acenocoumarol to phenprocoumon on time in therapeutic range and INR variability: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) requires a high proportion of time in the therapeutic range (TTR) and a low international normalised ratio (INR) variability to be maximally safe and effective. Switching from short-acting acenocoumarol to long-acting phenprocoumon could improve VKA control. AIMS: We assessed whether switching from acenocoumarol to phenprocoumon improves the time in the therapeutic range (TTR) and INR variability. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a retrospective cohort with data on 236,957 patients-years of VKA management from two first-line anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands, we identified 124 patients in target range 2-3, 269 patients in target range 2-3.5 and 98 patients in target range 2.5-3.5 who switched from acenocoumarol to phenprocoumon. They were matched in a 1:2 ratio to non-switching controls using propensity score matching. Over the first 180 days after a switch, switchers' TTR declined 5 (95% CI 1 to 10), 10 (95% CI 7 to 13) and 5 (95% CI 0 to 11) percentage points relative to non-switchers, in target ranges 2-3, 2-3.5 and 2.5-3.5. Anticoagulation was more often supra-therapeutic in switchers, and switchers had a higher INR variability. In the following 180 days, TTR in switchers became 1 (95% CI -4 to 6), 4 (95% CI 0 to 7) and 6 (95% CI 1 to 12) percentage points better than in non-switchers. Switchers' INRs were much more stable than non-switchers'. CONCLUSION: Eventually, a switch from acenocoumarol to phenprocoumon leads to a higher TTR and a lower INR variability. However, this is preceded by a transition period with opposite effects. An improved conversion algorithm could possibly shorten the transition period. Until then, physicians and patients should decide whether switching is worth the increased risk during the transition phase.

Diagnóstico y tratamiento de la obstrucción al flujo en dispositivos de asistencia ventricular de flujo continuo. Un problema infrecuente / Flow obstruction of continuous-flow ventricular assist devices. Diagnosis and treatment of an uncommon problem

No disponible

Management of blunt hepatic and splenic injuries (grade ≤ III) in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Non-operative management (NOM) may be particularly challenging in patients receiving synchronous antithrombotic therapy (AT). The current study examined the feasibility of NOM in patients under AT who sustained blunt splenic or hepatic injuries. METHODS: We analyzed the results of a 5-year (2010-2014) pre-decided treatment protocol, including 15 patients under AT who were treated for splenic and/or hepatic injuries at our institution. The antithrombotic therapy consisted of acenocoumarol 4 mg, acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg. Vitamin K (Vit K), Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (PCC) were transfused to patients receiving anticoagulant therapy, while platelets (PLTs) were given to patients under antiplatelet therapy if their level was excessively low. The organ injury grading scale, injury severity score (ISS), the need for blood transfusion and intensive care unit (ICU)/ high dependency unit (HDU) admission, morbidity, mortality and duration of hospital stay were also recorded. RESULTS: Ten patients fulfilled the criteria for NOM and were treated accordingly. No conversion to operative management (OM) was required (success rate 100%). Five patients were managed surgically due to hemodynamic instability and/or signs of peritonitis. Reversal of AT was attempted in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamically stable patients under AT with blunt hepatic or splenic injuries (grade ≤ III) and no signs of peritonitis, may be good candidates for NOM, despite their bleeding tendency. The type of AT does not seem to influence the final outcome. Reversal of AT should be stratified individually. KEY WORDS: Antithrombotic therapy, Hemodynamic stability, Non-operative management.

Rivaroxabán en síndrome antifosfolipídico tras fracaso con acenocumarol: a propósito de 2 casos / After failure with acenocoumarol, rivaroxaban in antiphospholipid syndrome: a report of 2 cases

El síndrome antifosfolipídico se caracteriza por abortos o fenómenos trombóticos asociado a anticuerpos específicos. El tratamiento se basa en la anticoagulación con los antagonistas de la vitamina K. Presentamos 2 casos en los que el empleo del rivaroxabán ha logrado controlar la enfermedad tras su fracaso con acenocumarol

Antiphospholipid syndrome is characterized by abortions or thrombotic phenomena associated with specific antibodies. Anticoagulant therapy is based on vitamin K antagonists. We present two cases in which the use of rivaroxaban achieved control of the disease after the failure of acenocoumarol

Control de la presión arterial en pacientes con fibrilación auricular tratados con acenocumarol e índice de Rosendaal alterado / Control of blood pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with acenocoumarol and with an altered Rosendaal index

No disponible

Patient characteristics and stroke and bleeding events in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with apixaban and vitamin K antagonists: a Spanish real-world study.

Aim: To compare the risk of stroke, systemic thromboembolism and bleeding, in patients initiating apixaban or acenocoumarol for the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Methods: An observational, retrospective study was performed using medical records of patients who initiated apixaban or acenocoumarol between 2015 and 2017. Propensity score matching was used to match patients; stroke, systemic thromboembolism, major and minor bleeding events were compared between the matched patients. Results: Patients who were prescribed apixaban had a lower rate of systemic embolism/stroke (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.38-0.78; p = 0.001), minor bleeding (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.52-0.79; p < 0.001) and major bleeding (HR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.37-0.72; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients prescribed apixaban for the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation had lower rates of thromboembolic events and minor/major bleeding than patients on acenocoumarol.